Under section 232 ABGB, grandparents may owe maintenance for a grandchild to the extent the parents cannot provide it according to their means. The child's appropriate needs, the child's own resources and the financial limit protecting each grandparent all matter. Separation or divorce alone does not create a maintenance duty for grandparents.

Our maintenance topic page covers other questions about child and spousal maintenance.

When may grandparents owe maintenance?

Section 232 ABGB makes the parents' ability to provide maintenance the starting point. Grandparents may be liable only for the part the parents cannot provide according to their means. Both parents owe maintenance whether or not they were married to each other. Separation or divorce by itself does not show that they cannot provide it according to their means.

Section 231 ABGB also requires the contributions of both parents to be considered. Actual care arrangements matter to that assessment. The answer depends on the family's financial and care situation.

Grandparents' contact rights are a separate issue. Our article Grandparent contact after separation deals with contact and the child's welfare. For broader family-law issues, the firm's German-language family-law overview is available on its main website.

How are the child's needs assessed?

The child's needs must be appropriate to the parents' living conditions. Under section 231(1) ABGB, both parents contribute in proportion to their means. The assessment also considers the child's aptitudes, abilities, interests and development. A parent's care of the child counts as a contribution. Under the conditions in section 231(2), a financial contribution from the caregiving parent may also become relevant.

The figure shown by arrears under a maintenance order does not by itself show what needs are appropriate for the child. The assessment asks what the child reasonably needs and what the parents can provide in their current circumstances. The statute sets no universal monthly amount.

When do the child's own assets matter?

The child's own income reduces the maintenance claim under section 231(3) ABGB. Section 232 also covers the capital of the child's own assets where it is reasonable to use it. Income and capital must therefore be considered separately.

Whether savings or another asset can reasonably be used depends on the circumstances. The mere fact that an asset exists does not create a general duty to spend every asset.

What financial limit protects a grandparent?

Even where a shortfall remains after considering the parents' means, a grandparent's duty must not endanger that grandparent's own adequate support. Section 232 ABGB requires other maintenance and care obligations to be considered as well.

The limit must therefore be assessed for each grandparent in light of their finances and other obligations. The statute sets no uniform income threshold or fixed share for the two sides of the family.

Which documents help assess the position?

A useful first step is to record the child's regular needs, care arrangements and additional expenses, as well as any income or assets belonging to the child. Our article on special needs in child maintenance discusses additional child-related costs separately.

For both parents, useful records include current income, existing maintenance duties, payments made and care arrangements. For each grandparent who may be involved, records of income, necessary regular expenses and other maintenance duties help show the statutory limit. These practical documents correspond to the statutory factors; the law does not set a closed list.

What does a maintenance order against a parent prove?

An existing maintenance order can show what a parent was required to pay. Payment records can show what was received. Neither fact alone answers whether the parents are unable to provide maintenance according to their means. An unpaid balance does not automatically become a debt owed by the grandparents.

If an order exists, review it together with current payment records and the parents' present financial circumstances. For steps concerning an existing order against a parent, see our article on enforcing child maintenance under an existing title.

First orientation

Which issue should be clarified first?

Choose the situation closest to yours. The selection is a starting point and does not assess your exact income or maintenance duties.

Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.

01 Question 1

Which situation best describes your concern?

Select one answer.

All paths at a glance

Overview of all answers.

01

The parents' contributions and the child's needs should be assessed together.

Gather information about the child's needs, the contributions made and both parents' current financial positions. Section 232 ABGB matters only to the extent the parents cannot provide maintenance according to their means. The separate limit protecting each grandparent must then be considered.
02

An existing order and the parents' ability to pay are separate questions.

Keep the order, an up-to-date payment record and information about the liable parent's current finances together. Arrears alone do not show whether the parents are unable to provide maintenance according to their means.
03

The child's income and assets are separate points to assess.

List regular income and the child's own assets separately. Section 231(3) ABGB concerns income. Section 232 ABGB also considers the child's assets where it is reasonable to use their capital.
FAQ

Frequently asked questions about grandparent maintenance

Must both parents have no income before grandparents can be liable?
No. Section 232 asks to what extent the parents can provide maintenance according to their means. Section 231 allocates parental contributions in light of their circumstances. Income alone does not answer the question. The issue is what appropriate need remains after considering those contributions.
Is a maintenance order against a parent required?
Section 232 identifies the parents' ability to provide maintenance as the relevant condition. An order can document what a parent was required to pay, but it does not by itself show whether the parents can provide maintenance according to their means.
Must the child use all their savings?
Section 232 considers the child's own assets only where it is reasonable to use their capital. The mere existence of savings does not create a general duty to spend all of them.