A person claiming post-divorce maintenance for earlier months can rely on section 72 of the Austrian Marriage Act only from the point when the obligor went into default or when the maintenance claim became pending in court. The claim itself, its amount and its due date still have to be established from the title, settlement or legal basis.
The sequence of events therefore matters: When was payment due, when was a demand made, when can delivery of that demand be shown, and when did court proceedings make the maintenance claim pending? Section 72 does not create an automatic claim from the start of the separation or divorce.
This article separates the two time anchors in section 72 and shows which documents support a month-by-month review. It concerns post-divorce spousal maintenance, not child-maintenance enforcement or a general limitation calculation.
What should be clarified first for earlier maintenance months?
This short check separates the payment date, demand and pending proceedings.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
Which starting point applies?
Choose the situation closest to your case. The check does not replace a review of the claim and the supporting documents.
Overview of all answers.
Compare due dates and arrears
Keep the title or settlement, the agreed payment date and bank statements in monthly order. This allows the missed payment date to be reviewed where a payment time was fixed.
Prepare a clear and provable demand
Describe the maintenance claim, the relevant months and the requested performance clearly. Keep proof of dispatch and delivery so the time anchor can be reviewed.
Establish the pending claim and its scope
Review the initiating court document and the date on which the maintenance claim became pending. For earlier periods, the review concerns the claim actually pursued in those proceedings.
What does section 72 limit for earlier months?
Section 72 of the Austrian Marriage Act names two time points from which a person entitled to maintenance may claim performance or damages for non-performance in the past: the point when the obligor went into default or the point when the maintenance claim became pending. The start of the separation or divorce is therefore not by itself the relevant time anchor.
The provision addresses the temporal reach of the claim. Whether maintenance is owed at all and what amount was due depends on the specific legal basis, title, settlement and economic circumstances. Those questions must be reviewed separately.
When does default begin?
Under section 1334 of the Austrian General Civil Code, delay is attributable to the debtor when a payment date fixed by law or contract is not observed. A fixed payment date therefore makes the due date and the missed payment the first points to review.
If the payment time is not fixed, section 1334 links the delay to a judicial or out-of-court demand. When the performance remains outstanding after the demand, the relevant point must be determined from the content and delivery of that demand. Calling a letter a demand does not settle the issue by itself.
Which details should a demand contain?
A useful demand should describe the post-divorce maintenance claim, the months concerned and the performance requested so that the other spouse can understand the reason for the request. If the amount is not yet final, the available calculation and the information used for it should be identified clearly.
The evidence chain matters for the later review: keep the letter, attachments, method of dispatch, proof of delivery, replies and any partial payments together. An unclear lump-sum demand makes it harder to identify which month and amount are covered by the relevant time anchor.
What role does the claim becoming pending play?
Once a maintenance claim becomes pending in court, section 72 can use that point as the time anchor for a claim relating to the past. The initiating document, its filing with the court and the period for which maintenance is sought are therefore important.
A later extension of the claim should not silently be assigned to earlier months. Keep all applications, amendments and corrections with their respective filing dates. The pending claim also does not replace proof of the legal basis, need and ability to pay.
How can the claim be supported month by month?
Prepare a monthly record showing the amount due, the payment date, the amount actually received and the outstanding balance. Add the date of the demand or the date when the claim became pending. This makes it possible to see which months preceded the relevant time anchor and which amounts arose afterwards.
The first review should include the maintenance title or settlement, income and need records, bank statements, messages, demands and court filings. The documents should also show partial payments, new agreements or changes to the claim.
Three time anchors
The starting position determines which date must be reviewed for earlier months.
| Starting position | Point to review | First documents | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Payment date fixed | A statute or agreement sets a payment date. | Establish the missed payment date and the resulting default. | Title or settlement, payment schedule, bank statements |
| Payment time open | The documents do not show a specific payment date. | Review the judicial or out-of-court demand and proof of delivery. | Demand, attachments, delivery record, reply |
| Maintenance claim pending | The maintenance claim has become pending in court. | Establish filing with the court and the periods claimed. | Claim or application, filing confirmation, later applications |
The table does not replace a review of the legal basis, amount or proceedings.
Four steps for the time review
A clear order keeps the claim, due date and arrears separate.
Secure the legal basis
Keep the title, settlement or other basis of the post-divorce maintenance claim in full.
Determine due dates
Read the payment date from the documents and assign the monthly amounts.
Support the time point
Document default through a missed payment or demand, or the pending claim with its date and proof.
Compare the months
Bring amounts due, partial payments, balances and applications together in chronological order.
For the review: Keep the title or settlement, monthly record, bank statements, demands with proof of delivery and court filings ready. Mark the first missed payment, delivery of a demand and filing of any maintenance application.
Subscribe to legal updates:
BRANDaktuelle Rechtsnews provide new articles and legal information from the firm. Subscribe to the newsletter
Claiming post-divorce maintenance for earlier months
Can post-divorce maintenance automatically be claimed from the separation?
Section 72 links a claim for the past to the point when the obligor went into default or when the maintenance claim became pending. The start of the separation alone is not enough as the time anchor.
What applies when a payment date was fixed?
Where a statute or agreement sets a payment date, review whether that date was observed. The date, missed payment and amount belong in a monthly evidence record.
Is an oral request enough?
Where the payment time is open, the demand under section 1334 must be classified carefully. A clear, provable demand identifying the months and requested performance is important for the later review.
What is the effect of pending proceedings?
Under section 72, the claim becoming pending can provide the time anchor for a claim relating to the past. The filing date and scope of the claim must be established.
Do I need a separate monthly record?
Yes. A record of amounts due, received and outstanding shows the temporal connection. Add payment dates, the demand, pending proceedings and partial payments.
Related topics
A spouse receiving care allowance: maintenance, purpose and division of assets
Review maintenance and purpose-bound benefits in another specific situation.
Maintenance and new income: when a review makes sense
Review changes in income, need and existing agreements.
Post-divorce maintenance: settlement, waiver and later change
Organize the legal basis and possible later adjustment before an agreement.